Monday, February 9, 2009

About NAIS and why it effects you

The first logical question is as follows: What is NAIS? Glad you asked says the USDA, "the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is a modern, streamlined information system that helps producers and animal health officials respond quickly and effectively to animal disease events in the United States."

It looks totally harmless until you read this from a completely different source:
Research and documentation by M. Oakley

"Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal Court

3.1.2 Ownership and control of property privileges Description

"premises to mean the buildings or parts of buildings and the land ancillary (connected to or existing as) thereto, irrespective of ownership, used for the purpose of...". The word "premises" includes a place and a conveyance in this section. Conveyance is the transfer of ownership of real property from the original owner to another... such as land....such as what happens when you sign up for Premises ID under NAIS and CONVEY ownership and control of your land and livestock to the USDA acting as agent for the federal government.

[Now we know how and why the word [premises] was used. The word premises is not only a redefinition of ownership and control within our legal system, but now under the International Criminal Court is also globally recognized and eliminates our private property rights and makes our own laws unavailable to us.]

Sect 3.2.1 cont.

As reflected in the discussions of the ICC Preparatory Commission Working Group, "the concept of legal capacity means that States (countries, provinces, commonwealths, or sovereign nations) will not subject the Court to national jurisdiction or legislation, and the Court will consult national authorities when it needs to act. Implementing legislation should not restrict the Court in the exercise of its functions or fulfillment of its purpose and should reflect the fact the Court is not subject to national law."

States may need to ensure steps are taken to guarantee the Court will have the capacity that may be necessary to exercise its functions and fulfillment of its purpose in that State, such as the capacity to contract, acquire and dispose of property and participate in national legal proceedings."

http://www.icclr.law.ubc.ca/Publications/Reports/ICC%20Reports/APIC_Guide_ENG.pdf

There is far more to this, but you get the idea: Bruce Knight was advocating a return to the International Court System because it would facilitate the NAIS. It would do this by ignoring Constitutional laws and rights, substituting global efforts to seize privately held lands and material property and any suits brought against state or federal agencies attempting to force NAIS would now be directed to the ICC.....where the individual is not recognized as owning or controlling property.

Think they can’t get away with this? Well..here is a law from 1949 that says they can and you can’t do anything about it.

Agreement on Privilege and Immunities of the Organisation of American States.

http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/c-13.html

© 2009 Marti Oakley "


I'm still doing research but it's curious to see these two sides.

No comments: